Large Language Models (LLMs) are highly vulnerable to input perturbations, as even a small prompt change may result in a substantially different output. Existing methods to enhance LLM robustness are primarily focused on perturbed data samples, whereas improving resiliency to perturbations of task-level instructions has remained relatively underexplored. In this work, we focus on character- and word-level edits of task-specific instructions, which substantially degrade downstream performance. We experiment with a variety of techniques to enhance the robustness of LLMs, including self-denoising and representation alignment, testing different models (Llama 3 and Flan-T5), datasets (CoLa, QNLI, SST-2) and instructions (both task-oriented and role-oriented). We find that, on average, self-denoising—whether performed by a frozen LLM or a fine-tuned model—achieves substantially higher performance gains than alternative strategies, including more complex baselines such as ensembling and supervised methods.